U.S. Supreme Court rules Donald Trump is allowed on Colorado’s ballot

Donald Trump can remain on Colorado’s ballot ahead of the Tuesday primary, the U.S. Supreme court ruled Monday morning, overturning a Colorado Supreme Court decision that had found the former president ineligible.

While the state court’s decision was on hold, the federal justices’ 9-0 ruling puts to rest questions about whether states can enforce the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment against any presidential candidate without permission from Congress.

“Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse,” says the per curiam opinion, which was not signed since it represents the opinion of the court.

The case was filed by a group of unaffiliated and Republican Colorado voters who argued Trump was ineligible for office under the Civil War-era amendment to the Constitution. Section Three of the 14th Amendment specifically bars people who engaged in insurrection or rebellion from office if they had previously taken an oath to support the Constitution.

Trumps’ words riled up the mob that later stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, the plaintiffs argued, and he took too little action to calm the riot — meeting the criteria for engaging in insurrection

The Colorado Supreme Court agreed in a December ruling, finding 4-3 that Trump was ineligible to appear on the state’s Republican presidential primary ballot. The court put that ruling on hold while Trump appealed it, so his name was printed on ballots for the state’s March 5 primary.

The case was brought as part of a national effort helmed by the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, and other groups. CREW zeroed in on Colorado because state laws allow voters to challenge the eligibility of candidates and the Colorado secretary of state has the power to keep ineligible candidates off the ballot.

“They tried to overthrow an election. You don’t do that in the United States,” Norma Anderson, a Republican plaintiff on the case and former majority leader in the state Senate, said ahead of the Feb. 8 oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court. “That’s a threat to democracy. I am concerned about our country if everyone thinks that’s fine. And Donald Trump was the instigator of that — no one else.”

Trump’s legal team and other opponents of barring him from the ballot quickly launched a defense based on what they characterized as vagaries of the insurrection clause: Is the presidency, which is not specified in the amendment’s text, an office under the United States, and does the restriction cover someone who took the presidential oath of office, which does not include the word “support”?

Trump’s legal team called the Jan. 6 riot “shameful, criminal (and) violent,” but they didn’t concede that it was an insurrection — or that Trump engaged in any insurrection.

Jonathan F. Mitchell, Trump’s lawyer before the U.S. Supreme Court, also cited a pending case in which Trump has argued he has presidential immunity and couldn’t be prosecuted for anything he did on Jan. 6, 2021, regardless.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Trusted Bulletin is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment